The media is under attack; everyone knows that. But as contributor Larry Checco of Silver Spring, Maryland points out in this Boomer Opinion piece for BoomerCafé, it’s not the first time in the lives of baby boomers that we’ve seen this.
If you don’t know what I’m talking about, go see Steven Spielberg’s new movie, The Post.
My goose bumps weren’t the result of actors Meryl Streep’s and Tom Hanks’ fine acting ability, although both turned in Oscar-quality performances.
No, those goose bumps rose because — in what now seems like a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away — there existed people like Graham, Bradlee, Daniel Ellsberg and others, including executives of The New York Times, who made difficult, professionally dangerous and potentially life-altering decisions, not for personal or political gain, but because they knew the decisions they were making were ethically and morally correct.
Although threatened and excoriated by a government swathed in secrecy and paranoia — the Nixon Administration — these people deeply believed that the citizens of the United States of America had a right to know that their government, over the course of 30 years and five presidents, had been lying to them.
The cost of those lies translated into the deaths of two million Vietnamese, many of whom were innocent women and children, nearly 60,000 American GIs, and about $1 trillion U.S. taxpayer dollars (when adjusted for inflation).
Why the lies that prolonged the war?
No administration — from Harry Truman’s to Richard Nixon’s — wanted to go down in history as having “lost” Vietnam to communism. It was more about losing political face than winning a war.
According to the Pentagon Papers, 10-percent of the war was fought to help the people of Vietnam, 20% to contain Communist China, and a full 70% to save face.
However, the principal characters in this courageous escapade to uphold the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and to publish the papers had more to lose than face.
Ellsberg, who photocopied — by hand — 7,000 pages of the Rand Report that became known as the Pentagon Papers, faced life imprisonment for treason. The leaders of The Washington Post — Graham and Bradlee — also risked jail time, their reputations, and in Graham’s case, The Washington Post itself. The movie does a great job dramatizing all of this.
The fact is, the First Amendment of our Constitution states: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
That’s a lot of serious ground covered in a mere 45 words.
But if you are a strict constructionist of the constitution, which many in America are, the code is clear, “Congress shall make no law…abridging the freedom…of the press.”
What the Constitution does not address, however, is how far our political leaders and others can go in trashing or discrediting that free press, or what we now call “the media”.
Who you trust is paramount to what you believe.
With the advent of “fake news” — promoted these days from the highest levels of our government, no less— we’ve entered into a very squirrelly state in our democracy.
Consider this: if, in 1971, we believed that the publication of the Pentagon Papers was nothing more than the mainstream media perpetrating a conspiracy against the U.S. government — as many have come to believe the media is doing today — the Vietnam War may have gone on for several more years. As it is, the war didn’t end until April, 1975.
We have faced many crises since the inception of our democracy, but few as serious as the assault our free press is experiencing today. If all we have is a government dictating to us what its own “truth” is, history has proven we’re in deep do-do.
Kudos to today’s Grahams, Bradlees, and Ellsbergs who are still out there, acting as checks on our government, trying to keep it honest. If that check goes, so does our democracy.