America’s Retirement Mismatch: a challenge for baby boomers

When you start wondering as a baby boomer whether you’re going to have enough money to support yourself in retirement, you want a retirement expert to give you good advice, right? We can’t think of a better one than the woman our friends came up with over at NextAvenue.org: Alicia H. Munnell. She not only has been a member of the President’s Council of Economic Advisers, former assistant secretary of the Treasury for economic policy, and senior vice president and director of research at the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, but she now is the director of the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College. And in the interest of looking for a fix to the challenge of supporting ourselves as long as we need to, she writes about what she calls, America’s Retirement Mismatch.

Consider our current situation. We face a sharp mismatch between our retirement needs and our retirement resources.

Alicia Munnell, economist and member of the President’s Council of Economic Advisers.

Alicia Munnell, economist and member of the President’s Council of Economic Advisers.

Delaying Social Security benefits from age 62 to 70 increases monthly payments by 76 percent, with a comparable impact on 401(k) plans.

We need more money than ever before because we are living longer and continuing to retire relatively early (the average retirement age is 64 for men, 62 for women), which means that we have to support ourselves for two to three decades. This extension in the retirement span has occurred while health care costs have risen substantially and show signs of further increase.

At the same time, real interest rates are at historic lows, so we need a bigger nest egg to produce a useful stream of income.

Where Social Security Fits In

Yet at the same time we need more retirement income, we are now getting less from Social Security, the foundation of the nation’s retirement system.

Under current law, Social Security replacement rates — retirement benefits as a percentage of pre-retirement earnings — are being gradually reduced as the so-called Full Retirement Age rises, Medicare premiums take a bigger bite of benefit checks and more people are subject to taxes on their benefits.

Moreover, Social Security faces a long-term deficit, so benefits could be cut even further to restore balance.

The other main source of retirement income — for workers fortunate enough to have coverage — is employer pensions. Here, the shift from traditional pensions to 401(k) plans has transferred all of the risk and responsibility to workers. As a result, while 401(k)s could be an effective way to save, today they are clearly falling short.

health costsA Potential Bright Spot

The one potential bright spot in this gloomy picture is that many of us are saving through our house with each monthly mortgage payment and we could tap this home equity in retirement to help pay the bills. But hardly anyone does.

If things continue this way, more than half of today’s working households will not be able to maintain their standard of living once they stop working.

That’s the bad news.

How to Fix the Problem

The good news is that we can fix the problem — by working longer and saving more.

In terms of working longer, most of us are healthier and have less physically demanding jobs than our parents and grandparents. And we are living much longer. So stretching out our work lives is a sensible option.

And the payoff is dramatic. Delaying Social Security benefits from age 62 to 70 increases monthly payments by 76 percent, with a comparable impact on 401(k) plans.

Seventy-two percent of America’s retired baby boomers are not currently working for pay in retirement.

Seventy-two percent of America’s retired baby boomers are not currently working for pay in retirement.

On the saving front, we need to fix Social Security (leaning much more toward higher revenues than lower benefits, in my opinion) and boost 401(k) savings by expanding the use of the automatic 401(k), a model that is a proven success. (With an automatic plan, employees are automatically enrolled and can choose to opt out.)

We also need to solve the pension coverage gap for the half of private sector workers without a 401(k) plan.

The final piece of the saving puzzle is the house. Most people will need to tap their home equity — either by downsizing or taking a reverse mortgage — to help pay the monthly bills in retirement.

Solving the retirement security problem is a high priority, because worrying about running out of money should not be part of growing older.

© Twin Cities Public Television – 2015. All rights reserved.

2 Comments

  1. I am a great believer in the need for baby boomers to redesign their lives in their later years with expanded passions, renewed relationships, and a changed life direction. However, all of those points are secondary to establishing sufficient financial support. I appreciated the article, as it is not easy to achieve that goal. With social security income (which I have yet to start), it has been a challenge to gain a clear understanding of exactly what I will receive. And I am told by many friends that what they say you will receive and what you actually receive can be different. So, good luck to everyone. We may need it!

  2. all this hype about how much you really need to retire is just a scare tactic. I have a couple of work friends who retired and just have social security, pension and a 401 and they tell me they are still saving money and did not need what they were told they needed to retire. If you are not happy where you are or who you are and think you can buy happiness then you will never be happy and need all more than you need

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *